Revision of the Evaluation Panels within the Judicial Vetting Commission

The Judicial Vetting Commission has decided to reconstitute its Evaluation Panels A and B, assigned to evaluate certain categories of judges under Law 252/2023. This decision, adopted during a Commission meeting, aims to enhance consistency in the evaluation of facts.

The two panels, established by the Commission in July 2024, will continue to operate in their initial composition until the evaluation of all previously assigned subjects is completed, including cases referred for re-evaluation. As of the effective date of the new composition, evaluation cases will be assigned—through the same random allocation procedure—to the panels in their revised format.

Updated composition of the Evaluation Panels:

Evaluation Panel A

Andrei BIVOL (national member)

Lavly PERLING (international member)

Willem BROUWER (international member)

Chaired by the Commission’s Vice Chairperson, Andrei Bivol.

Evaluation Panel B

Scott BALES (international member)

Iurie GAȚCAN (national member)

Lilian ENCIU (national member)

Chaired by the Commission’s Chairperson, Scott Bales.

Today, the 14 judges who have held positions as court presidents and vice-presidents in the past five years and are currently undergoing the evaluation procedure were informed of the revised composition of the panels and the specific panel to which their evaluation has been assigned.

Pursuant to Law 252/2023 on the external evaluation of judges and prosecutors, the six members of the Commission are organized into two evaluation panels — Panel A and Panel B — each composed of three members in a mixed composition (national and international). The panels hold the same mandate as the Commission, and evaluation cases are allocated randomly between them.

‍

Revision of the Evaluation Panels within the Judicial Vetting Commission

Subscribe for notifications.

Other press releases

Evaluation procedure for Supreme Court candidate Valeriu Pleșca has been discontinued

Several judges being found to have no integrity issues following external evaluation

4 of the 24 notified court presidents and vice-presidents remain in the external evaluation process

A report with a recommendation for non-promotion and a dissenting opinion submitted to the SCM for review

New candidates for the Supreme Court of Justice undergoing external evaluation

Two civil society candidates undergoing external evaluation for the position of member in the Disciplinary Board

Proposal for failure of the external evaluation for a judge of the Central Court of Appeal

Judicial vetting enters its final stage with the evaluation of Court Presidents and -Vice Presidents

Evaluation completed for judge Mihail Diaconu of the Central Court of Appeal

Two evaluation reports concerning judges from the Central Court of Appeal, submitted to the SCM

Judge Braga case referred for re-evaluation by the SCM

Evaluation status at the Central Court of Appeal: 12 reports submitted to the SCM, 6 reports in progress

Revised procedures for publishing evaluation reports pursuant to a ruling by the Constitutional Court

Commission recommends failure in integrity evaluation for a Central Court of Appeal Judge

Proposal for the pass of the external evaluation for a judge of the Central Court of Appeal

Annual Report of the Judicial Vetting Commission: progress, challenges, and perspectives

Evaluation completed for two more judges of the Central Court of Appeal

New candidates submitted for evaluation

OFFICIAL STATEMENT

Evaluation completed for a candidate to the Supreme Court and a judge from the Central Court of Appeal

The importance of hearings in the integrity evaluation of judges

Update regarding a rescheduled hearing

Notification of scheduled hearing for Central Appellate Court judge Mihail Diaconu

Two new evaluation reports on judges of the Central Court of Appeal submitted to the SCM

Withdrawal from the vetting process: Legal implications and consequences

First evaluation reports on the integrity of judges from the Central Court of Appeal submitted to SCM

Evaluation procedure for SCJ candidate Dumitru Mardari, ceased

How did the hearings of the Central Court of Appeal judges unfold and how long did the longest hearing last?

Additional actions in the hearings of judges from the Central Court of Appeal

Integrity assessment begins for five additional candidates for judge at the Central Court of Appeal

Hearings of the Judges of the Central Court of Appeal continue

Statement of clarification

First hearings in the evaluation process of judges from the Central Court of Appeal

Announcement regarding the rescheduling of the Judicial Vetting Commission hearings on February 3

All Judges of the Central Court of Appeal to be heard in the next two weeks

Judicial Vetting Commission hearing schedule for 3 - 5 February 2025

Hearings for Court of Appeal Judges in the vetting process start

Eight candidates for positions at the Courts of Appeal notified about the initiation of the vetting procedure

The only candidate referred for reevaluation to the Vetting Commission withdrew from the competition for the SCJ

Integrity of the winners of the competition for judge positions at the Chișinău and Bălți Courts of Appeal will be verified

Vetting of Judges: results in 2024 and objectives for 2025

Judicial Vetting at the Bălți, Cahul, and Comrat Courts of Appeal: 8 out of 23 judges decided to undergo evaluation

Evaluation completed for a prosecutor running for the Supreme Court of Justice judge

Failed evaluation for a candidate to the Supreme Court of Justice

50 completed evaluations by the Vetting Commission: The most common reasons for failure

A new candidate has been referred to the Vetting Commission for evaluation

The Vetting Commission has completed the evaluation of all candidates received under law on pre-vetting

Judicial candidate for SCM to represent the Courts of Appeal fails integrity evaluation

Vetting Commission initiates evaluation of the Courts of Appeal in Bălți, Cahul, and Comrat

SCJ Vetting: Report on evaluation failure for a sitting Supreme Court Judge

Judges from the Courts of Appeal in Cahul, Comrat and Bălți are the next to be evaluated by the Vetting Commission

Evaluation completed for all candidates in the two specialized judicial boards

Two candidates for the Disciplinary Board of Judges received their evaluation results

Evaluation completed for one candidate to the Supreme Court of Justice and four candidates for membership in the specialized boards of judges

Details on the management of information gathered by the Commission in the evaluation process

They passed the evaluation and can access positions in the specialized Boards of the SCM

HEARINGS scheduled for 16 - 19 September 2024

A judge withdrew from the competition for the position of member of the Disciplinary Board of Judges

The chairman of the Vetting Commission participated at the Justice Reform and Anti-Corruption Forum

Notifications of hearing participation – September 2024

Key aspects regarding the operation of the panels in evaluating certain categories of judges

Formation of Evaluation Panels in Accordance with Law 252/2023

Judge Andrei Cazacicov has passed the external evaluation by the Vetting Commission

Evaluation decisions regarding three candidates for the SCM and one candidate for the Disciplinary Board

Willem Brouwer has been appointed as the new international member of the Vetting Commission

Activity of the Vetting Commission in FIGURES

Two SCJ candidates and three candidates for the Evaluation and Selection Board of Judges passed the external evaluation

Notice regarding the conduct of a hearing after a previous postponement

Two candidates for the Disciplinary Board of Judges heard by the Vetting Commission

Notice concerning the rescheduling of a hearing

Information pertaining to the hearings conducted by the Vetting Commission on June 11th

Evaluation Report of the SCJ candidate, Alexandru Rotari, sent to the SCM for examination

The Vetting Commission will conduct hearings from 11 to 13 June 2024

Several judges and lawyers, subjects of external evaluation, have been invited to hearings by the Vetting Commission

Judge Ion Talpa passed the evaluation of the Vetting Commission

One more candidate for membership in the Evaluation and Selection Board of Judges passed the external evaluation

Evaluation completed for three candidates to the SCJ and one sitting SCJ judge