Completion of the vetting procedure at the Northern and Southern Courts of Appeal

The Superior Council of Magistracy (SCM) today approved the reports of the Judicial Vetting Commission concerning the judges of the Southern Court of Appeal, Dmitri Fujenco and Serghei Pilipenco. The SCM’s review of these two reports marks the completion of the external integrity evaluation of all judges in office at the time the vetting process was initiated at the two regional Courts of Appeal.

A total of 23 judges from the Northern and Southern Courts of Appeal were subject to an external integrity evaluation. At the Northern Court of Appeal (formerly the Bălți Court of Appeal, following the reorganization of appellate courts), 12 of the 15 judges resigned after being notified by the Commission of the initiation of integrity checks. At the Southern Court of Appeal (formerly the Cahul and Comrat Courts of Appeal, which were merged into a single court), 3 of the 8 judges resigned. Consequently, 8 judges completed the full external evaluation process.

During the evaluation process, the Commission’s reports recommended:

Promotion for 5 judges;
Non-promotion for 3 judges.

The SCM reviewed the evaluation results, approved all Commission reports, and confirmed their findings. These decisions can be appealed to the Supreme Court of Justice.

Once the SCM decisions become final, judges who did not pass the evaluation will be dismissed if still in office and will be prohibited from holding any public position for a period of 5 to 7 years.

Below is a graphic overview of the regional Courts of Appeal vetting results, indicating which judges passed and which did not.

Completion of the vetting procedure at the Northern and Southern Courts of Appeal

Subscribe for notifications.

Other press releases

Ongoing reevaluation: judge Silvia Cecan reheard by the Commission

The Judicial Vetting Commission held hearings with judges Andrei Mocanu and Ana Panov

Judicial vetting: preliminary results for judges Angela Bostan and Vitalie Budeci

Two lawyers have withdrawn from competitions for positions within the judicial system

Judges’ vetting continues: Four public hearings scheduled for October 15 and 16

Withdrawal of Natalia Paustovscaia from the competition for member of the Disciplinary Board of Judges

Vetting procedure launched for a lawyer candidate to the Supreme Court

A judge from the Southern Court of Appeal did not pass the integrity evaluation, according to the Vetting Commission

External evaluation of the interim Vice President of Strășeni District Court finalized with proposal for promotion

Repeated public hearings for two judges from the Courts of Appeal

Public hearings: Three cases examined by the Judicial Vetting Commission

Integrity evaluation of judge Serghei Pilipenco from the Southern Court of Appeal – completed

Judicial inspector withdraws from competition for Supreme Court position

Judicial Vetting Commission announces a new round of public hearings

New panels established to ensure continuity in the external evaluation of judges

Judges Vitalie Budeci and Serghei Pilipenco publicly heard by the Judicial Vetting Commission

Two judges to be heard on Wednesday, 6 August by the Judicial Vetting Commission

SCM accepted three evaluation reports and excluded a former judge from the Central Court of Appeal competition

13 Evaluation Reports of the Judicial Vetting Commission reviewed by the SCM. What decisions were taken?

New members appointed to the Judicial Vetting Commission

A judge from the Court of Appeal North failed the integrity evaluation, according to the Judicial Vetting Commission

On the litigations involving the Judicial Vetting Commission

Commission updates Rules of Organization and Functioning following recent legislative amendments on external evaluation

External evaluation of judges – Two years of activity by the Evaluation Commission

A candidate for the position of judge at the Central Court of Appeal has withdrawn from the competition

External evaluation of the Central Court of Appeal completed: the last report submitted to SCM for review

16 external evaluations completed for sitting judges and candidates for vacant judicial positions

New public hearings scheduled by the Judicial Vetting Commission for the week of June 16–20

Public hearings for several subjects found to have no integrity issues in the external evaluation

Hearing schedule for June 9 and 10

Evaluation procedure for Supreme Court candidate Valeriu Pleșca has been discontinued

Several judges being found to have no integrity issues following external evaluation

Revision of the Evaluation Panels within the Judicial Vetting Commission

4 of the 24 notified court presidents and vice-presidents remain in the external evaluation process

A report with a recommendation for non-promotion and a dissenting opinion submitted to the SCM for review

New candidates for the Supreme Court of Justice undergoing external evaluation

Two civil society candidates undergoing external evaluation for the position of member in the Disciplinary Board

Proposal for failure of the external evaluation for a judge of the Central Court of Appeal

Judicial vetting enters its final stage with the evaluation of Court Presidents and -Vice Presidents

Evaluation completed for judge Mihail Diaconu of the Central Court of Appeal

Two evaluation reports concerning judges from the Central Court of Appeal, submitted to the SCM

Judge Braga case referred for re-evaluation by the SCM

Evaluation status at the Central Court of Appeal: 12 reports submitted to the SCM, 6 reports in progress

Revised procedures for publishing evaluation reports pursuant to a ruling by the Constitutional Court

Commission recommends failure in integrity evaluation for a Central Court of Appeal Judge

Proposal for the pass of the external evaluation for a judge of the Central Court of Appeal

Annual Report of the Judicial Vetting Commission: progress, challenges, and perspectives

Evaluation completed for two more judges of the Central Court of Appeal

New candidates submitted for evaluation

OFFICIAL STATEMENT

Evaluation completed for a candidate to the Supreme Court and a judge from the Central Court of Appeal

The importance of hearings in the integrity evaluation of judges

Update regarding a rescheduled hearing

Notification of scheduled hearing for Central Appellate Court judge Mihail Diaconu

Two new evaluation reports on judges of the Central Court of Appeal submitted to the SCM

Withdrawal from the vetting process: Legal implications and consequences

First evaluation reports on the integrity of judges from the Central Court of Appeal submitted to SCM

Evaluation procedure for SCJ candidate Dumitru Mardari, ceased

How did the hearings of the Central Court of Appeal judges unfold and how long did the longest hearing last?

Additional actions in the hearings of judges from the Central Court of Appeal

Integrity assessment begins for five additional candidates for judge at the Central Court of Appeal

Hearings of the Judges of the Central Court of Appeal continue

Statement of clarification

First hearings in the evaluation process of judges from the Central Court of Appeal

Announcement regarding the rescheduling of the Judicial Vetting Commission hearings on February 3

All Judges of the Central Court of Appeal to be heard in the next two weeks

Judicial Vetting Commission hearing schedule for 3 - 5 February 2025

Hearings for Court of Appeal Judges in the vetting process start

Eight candidates for positions at the Courts of Appeal notified about the initiation of the vetting procedure

The only candidate referred for reevaluation to the Vetting Commission withdrew from the competition for the SCJ

Integrity of the winners of the competition for judge positions at the Chișinău and Bălți Courts of Appeal will be verified

Vetting of Judges: results in 2024 and objectives for 2025

Judicial Vetting at the Bălți, Cahul, and Comrat Courts of Appeal: 8 out of 23 judges decided to undergo evaluation

Evaluation completed for a prosecutor running for the Supreme Court of Justice judge

Failed evaluation for a candidate to the Supreme Court of Justice

50 completed evaluations by the Vetting Commission: The most common reasons for failure

A new candidate has been referred to the Vetting Commission for evaluation